↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the returns to UK publicly funded cancer-related research in terms of the net value of improved health outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
89 tweeters
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating the returns to UK publicly funded cancer-related research in terms of the net value of improved health outcomes
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-12-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Glover, Martin Buxton, Susan Guthrie, Stephen Hanney, Alexandra Pollitt, Jonathan Grant

Abstract

Building on an approach developed to assess the economic returns to cardiovascular research, we estimated the economic returns from UK public and charitable funded cancer-related research that arise from the net value of the improved health outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 5%
Malaysia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 92 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 39%
Student > Master 15 15%
Other 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 14%
Social Sciences 12 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 12 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#106,612
of 16,275,395 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#103
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#971
of 158,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,275,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them