↓ Skip to main content

Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Yoga in addition to standard care for patients with haematological malignancies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010146.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Felbel, Joerg J Meerpohl, Ina Monsef, Andreas Engert, Nicole Skoetz

Abstract

Haematological malignancies are malignant neoplasms of the myeloid or lymphatic cell lines including leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma. In order to manage physical and psychological aspects of the disease and its treatment, complementary therapies like yoga are coming increasingly into focus. However, the effectiveness of yoga practice for people suffering from haematological malignancies remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 155 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 22%
Unspecified 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 43 27%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 28%
Unspecified 33 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Psychology 23 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,338,473
of 13,528,132 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,840
of 10,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,206
of 155,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,528,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.