You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Exploring Condensins with Magnetic Tweezers
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 13 |
Book title |
Methods in Molecular Biology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7098-8_13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7097-1, 978-1-4939-7098-8
|
Authors |
Sarkar, Rupa, Rybenkov, Valentin V., Rupa Sarkar, Valentin V. Rybenkov |
Abstract |
The signature activity of condensins as DNA reshaping machines is their ability to impose the giant loop architecture onto the chromosome. At the heart of this activity lies the propensity of the proteins to assemble into macromolecular clusters that bring distant DNA segments together. This gives rise to a rich dynamic behavior when the proteins are presented with the DNA substrate. The protocols in this section describe how the interaction between Escherichia coli condensin MukB and DNA proceeds in real time as observed using magnetic tweezers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
France | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,362,315
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,219
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,841
of 316,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#27
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.