You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Homologous Recombineering to Generate Chromosomal Deletions in Escherichia coli
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
The Bacterial Nucleoid
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7098-8_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7097-1, 978-1-4939-7098-8
|
| Authors |
Jack A. Bryant, David J. Lee, Bryant, Jack A., Lee, David J. |
| Abstract |
Homologous recombination methods enable modifications to be made to the bacterial chromosome. Commonly, the λ phage RED proteins are employed as a site-specific recombinase system, to facilitate recombination of linear DNA fragments with targeted regions of the chromosome. Here we describe methods for the efficient delivery of linear DNA segments containing homology to the chromosome into the cell as substrates for the λRED proteins. Combined with antibiotic selection and counterselection, we demonstrate that using this method facilitates accurate, rapid editing of the chromosome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,980,451
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,741
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,616
of 421,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#416
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.