↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: Social Media Responses to the January 2014 Online Emergency Medicine Journal Club on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage∗

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Emergency Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Peer reviews Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: Social Media Responses to the January 2014 Online Emergency Medicine Journal Club on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage∗
Published in
Annals of Emergency Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.05.015
Pubmed ID
24951414
Authors

Teresa M. Chan, Hans Rosenberg, Michelle Lin

Abstract

From January 20 to 24, 2014, Annals continued a successful collaboration with an academic Web site, Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM), to host another Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club session featuring the 2013 Journal of the American Medical Association article "Clinical Decision Rules to Rule Out Subarachnoid Hemorrhage for Acute Headache" by Perry et al. This online journal club used the power of rapid Twitter conversations, a live videocast with the authors, and more detailed discussions hosted on the ALiEM Web site's comment section. There were more than 1,431 individuals from 501 cities in 59 countries who viewed the blog post. During this 5-day event, 28 comments (average word count 153 words) and 206 tweets were made. This summary article details the community discussion, shared insights, and analytic data generated during this novel, multiplatform approach.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 41 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 16 36%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 42%
Computer Science 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2015.
All research outputs
#1,369,243
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#868
of 6,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,652
of 227,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#16
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.