You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CIRCUS: a package for Circos display of structural genome variations from paired-end and mate-pair sequencing data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-15-198 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delphine Naquin, Yves d’Aubenton-Carafa, Claude Thermes, Maud Silvain |
| Abstract |
Detection of large genomic rearrangements, such as large indels, duplications or translocations is now commonly achieved by next generation sequencing (NGS) approaches. Recently, several tools have been developed to analyze NGS data but the resulting files are difficult to interpret without an additional visualization step. Circos (Genome Res, 19:1639-1645, 2009), a Perl script, is a powerful visualization software that requires setting up numerous configuration files with a large number of parameters to handle. R packages like RCircos (BMC Bioinformatics, 14:244, 2013) or ggbio (Genome Biol, 13:R77, 2012) provide functions to display genomic data as circular Circos-like plots. However, these tools are very general and lack the functions needed to filter, format and adjust specific input genomic data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Japan | 3 | 12% |
| Sweden | 2 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 69% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,766,036
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#753
of 7,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,791
of 243,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#16
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.