↓ Skip to main content

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and Cancer Recurrence and Survival in CALGB 89803 (Alliance)

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
20 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and Cancer Recurrence and Survival in CALGB 89803 (Alliance)
Published in
PLoS ONE, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0099816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A. Fuchs, Kaori Sato, Donna Niedzwiecki, Xing Ye, Leonard B. Saltz, Robert J. Mayer, Rex B. Mowat, Renaud Whittom, Alexander Hantel, Al Benson, Daniel Atienza, Michael Messino, Hedy Kindler, Alan Venook, Shuji Ogino, Kana Wu, Walter C. Willett, Edward L. Giovannucci, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt

Abstract

In colon cancer patients, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and high dietary glycemic load have been associated with increased risk of cancer recurrence. High sugar-sweetened beverage intake has been associated with obesity, diabetes, and cardio-metabolic diseases, but the influence on colon cancer survival is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 18 15%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 14%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 17 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#357,333
of 17,175,498 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#5,851
of 163,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,324
of 195,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#164
of 3,011 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,175,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 163,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,011 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.