↓ Skip to main content

Mapping Mountain Pine Beetle Mortality through Growth Trend Analysis of Time-Series Landsat Data

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Mapping Mountain Pine Beetle Mortality through Growth Trend Analysis of Time-Series Landsat Data
Published in
Remote Sensing, June 2014
DOI 10.3390/rs6065696
Authors

Lu Liang, Yanlei Chen, Todd Hawbaker, Zhiliang Zhu, Peng Gong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Slovakia 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 29%
Researcher 18 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Other 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Computer Science 5 8%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,123,442
of 4,505,692 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#370
of 762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,804
of 107,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.