↓ Skip to main content

Cryoconite as a temporary sink for anthropogenic species stored in glaciers

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryoconite as a temporary sink for anthropogenic species stored in glaciers
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-10220-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Baccolo, Biagio Di Mauro, Dario Massabò, Massimiliano Clemenza, Massimiliano Nastasi, Barbara Delmonte, Michele Prata, Paolo Prati, Ezio Previtali, Valter Maggi

Abstract

Cryoconite, the typical sediment found on the surface of glaciers, is mainly known in relation to its role in glacial microbiology and in altering the glacier albedo. But if these aspects are relatively well addressed, the same cannot be said about the geochemical properties of cryoconite and the possible interactions with glacial and peri-glacial environment. Current glacier retreat is responsible for the secondary emission of species deposited in high-altitude regions in the last decades. The role played by cryoconite in relation to such novel geochemical fluxes is largely unknown. Few and scarce observations suggest that it could interact with these processes, accumulating specific substances, but why, how and to what extent remain open questions. Through a multi-disciplinary approach we tried to shed lights. Results reveal that the peculiar composition of cryoconite is responsible for an extreme accumulation capability of this sediment, in particular for some, specific, anthropogenic substances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 19%
Environmental Science 13 18%
Chemistry 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,318,574
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#12,930
of 140,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,714
of 320,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#545
of 5,720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.