↓ Skip to main content

Tuberculose e diabetes: relacionamento probabilístico de bases de dados para o estudo da associação entre ambas doenças

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tuberculose e diabetes: relacionamento probabilístico de bases de dados para o estudo da associação entre ambas doenças
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000200013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Gadelha de Abreu, Artur Iuri Alves de Sousa, Maria Regina Fernandes de Oliveira, Mauro Niskier Sanchez, Ricardo Gadelha de Abreu, Artur Iuri Alves de Sousa, Maria Regina Fernandes de Oliveira, Mauro Niskier Sanchez

Abstract

to describe the profile of cases of tuberculosis and diabetes comorbidity in Brazil. this is a descriptive study with data from the Brazilian Information System for Notifiable Diseases - tuberculosis (Sinan-TB) and from the System of Registration and Monitoring of Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus (Hiperdia), from 2007 to 2011; probabilistic linkage was carried out with Reclink software. 24,443 cases of comorbidity were found, including 3,181 cases not registered on Sinan-TB; of the total number of recovered cases, mostly were males (57.2%), aged 40-59 years (52.3%), black/brown-skinned (68.4%), with five to eight years of schooling (78.4%), with no regular use of alcohol (86.5%) and negative serology for the HIV virus (91.8%). the cases found had similar profile to those registered on Sinan-TB and the probabilistic linkage of data from different information systems enabled the detection of cases not captured by surveillance.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 23%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#9,185,881
of 15,650,802 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#54
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,611
of 272,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,650,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them