↓ Skip to main content

Practical considerations for effective oral appliance use in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a clinical review

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep Science and Practice, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Practical considerations for effective oral appliance use in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a clinical review
Published in
Sleep Science and Practice, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41606-017-0013-8
Authors

Hiroko Tsuda, Naohisa Wada, Shin-ichi Ando

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 29%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 76%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#10,351,933
of 11,674,646 outputs
Outputs from Sleep Science and Practice
#10
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,023
of 263,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep Science and Practice
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,674,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.1. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.