↓ Skip to main content

Ecological risks and opportunities from engineered artificial flooding as a means of achieving environmental flow objectives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological risks and opportunities from engineered artificial flooding as a means of achieving environmental flow objectives
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, June 2014
DOI 10.1890/130259
Authors

Nick Bond, Justin Costelloe, Alison King, Danielle Warfe, Paul Reich, Stephen Balcombe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 29%
Engineering 5 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#836,537
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#292
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,879
of 242,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.