↓ Skip to main content

Ecological risks and opportunities from engineered artificial flooding as a means of achieving environmental flow objectives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological risks and opportunities from engineered artificial flooding as a means of achieving environmental flow objectives
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, September 2014
DOI 10.1890/130259
Authors

Nick Bond, Justin Costelloe, Alison King, Danielle Warfe, Paul Reich, Stephen Balcombe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Unspecified 6 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#971,284
of 11,307,883 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#410
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,895
of 184,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,307,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.