↓ Skip to main content

Steady-state global optimization of metabolic non-linear dynamic models through recasting into power-law canonical models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Steady-state global optimization of metabolic non-linear dynamic models through recasting into power-law canonical models
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-5-137
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Pozo, Alberto Marín-Sanguino, Rui Alves, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, Laureano Jiménez, Albert Sorribas

Abstract

Design of newly engineered microbial strains for biotechnological purposes would greatly benefit from the development of realistic mathematical models for the processes to be optimized. Such models can then be analyzed and, with the development and application of appropriate optimization techniques, one could identify the modifications that need to be made to the organism in order to achieve the desired biotechnological goal. As appropriate models to perform such an analysis are necessarily non-linear and typically non-convex, finding their global optimum is a challenging task. Canonical modeling techniques, such as Generalized Mass Action (GMA) models based on the power-law formalism, offer a possible solution to this problem because they have a mathematical structure that enables the development of specific algorithms for global optimization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 50 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Engineering 5 9%
Computer Science 4 7%
Mathematics 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,234,609
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#644
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,842
of 123,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.