↓ Skip to main content

Rapid tests for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in patients with suspected disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid tests for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in patients with suspected disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009135.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marleen Boelaert, Kristien Verdonck, Joris Menten, Temmy Sunyoto, Johan van Griensven, Francois Chappuis, Suman Rijal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 159 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 21%
Student > Master 32 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 31 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#239,650
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#630
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,433
of 188,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.