You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid tests for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in patients with suspected disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009135.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marleen Boelaert, Kristien Verdonck, Joris Menten, Temmy Sunyoto, Johan van Griensven, Francois Chappuis, Suman Rijal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 304 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 100 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#736,783
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,376
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,789
of 243,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.