↓ Skip to main content

Fundamentos, modelos conceituais, aplicações e pesquisa da terapia cognitiva

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 817)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fundamentos, modelos conceituais, aplicações e pesquisa da terapia cognitiva
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, October 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1516-44462008000600002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Knapp, Aaron T Beck

Abstract

There is growing interest in the cognitive model of psychotherapy stimulated by an extensive body of research findings demonstrating its effectiveness for a varied set of psychiatric disorders and medical conditions. This review article aims to give an overview of the historical and philosophical background to contemporary cognitive and cognitive-behavioral approaches to psychotherapy, pointing out similarities across and differences between them. A presentation of the cognitive model as designed by Aaron Beck, and some of the cognitive and behavioral techniques used in emotional disorders will be discussed. Outcome studies and meta-analyses contemplating the efficacy of cognitive and cognitive-behavioral therapies in various psychological and medical conditions will be briefly depicted.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 311 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 112 35%
Student > Master 63 20%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 4%
Professor 12 4%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 65 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 169 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 66 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,588,173
of 21,859,856 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#45
of 817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,431
of 111,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,859,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them