You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What interventions are effective on reducing inequalities in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income settings? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-634 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beibei Yuan, Mats Målqvist, Nadja Trygg, Xu Qian, Nawi Ng, Sarah Thomsen |
| Abstract |
The deadline for achieving Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 is approaching, but inequalities between disadvantaged and other populations is a significant barrier for progress towards achieving these goals. This systematic review aims to collect evidence about the differential effects of interventions on different sociodemographic groups in order to identify interventions that were effective in reducing maternal or child health inequalities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Andorra | 1 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 20% |
| Researcher | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 85 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,572,309
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,796
of 17,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,268
of 246,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#41
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.