↓ Skip to main content

Levothyroxine or minimally invasive therapies for benign thyroid nodules

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Levothyroxine or minimally invasive therapies for benign thyroid nodules
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004098.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Bandeira‐Echtler, Karla Bergerhoff, Bernd Richter

Abstract

Thyroid nodules (TN) are common in the adult population. Some physicians use suppressive levothyroxine (LT4) therapy to achieve a reduction in the number and volume of TN. In addition, minimally invasive treatments, such as percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) sclerotherapy, laser photocoagulation (LP), and microwave (MW), radiofrequency (RF) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation, have been proposed, especially for pressure symptoms and cosmetic complaints, as an alternative to surgery. However, the risk to benefit ratio of all treatments for benign TN is currently unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 366 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Other 76 20%
Unknown 103 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 10%
Psychology 16 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 116 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,343,250
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,808
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,037
of 243,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.