You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a worked example
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-67 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James Thomas, Alison O’Mara-Eves, Ginny Brunton |
Abstract |
Systematic reviews that address policy and practice questions in relation to complex interventions frequently need not only to assess the efficacy of a given intervention but to identify which intervention - and which intervention components - might be most effective in particular situations. Here, intervention replication is rare, and commonly used synthesis methods are less useful when the focus of analysis is the identification of those components of an intervention that are critical to its success. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 16 | 34% |
Canada | 5 | 11% |
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
South Africa | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 51% |
Scientists | 15 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 248 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 20% |
Researcher | 41 | 16% |
Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 5% |
Other | 45 | 17% |
Unknown | 54 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 73 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
Psychology | 13 | 5% |
Other | 42 | 16% |
Unknown | 64 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,181,939
of 25,123,616 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#163
of 2,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,470
of 234,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,123,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.