↓ Skip to main content

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000190.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilaiwan Chongruksut, Tanat Vaniyapong, Kittipan Rerkasem

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 26 28%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 16 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,554,564
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,786
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,895
of 188,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.