↓ Skip to main content

Collagen induced arthritis increases secondary metastasis in MMTV-PyV MT mouse model of mammary cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collagen induced arthritis increases secondary metastasis in MMTV-PyV MT mouse model of mammary cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-11-365
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lopamudra Das Roy, Sriparna Ghosh, Latha B Pathangey, Teresa L Tinder, Helen E Gruber, Pinku Mukherjee

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that sites of chronic inflammation are often associated with the establishment and growth of various malignancies. A common inflammatory condition in humans is autoimmune arthritis (AA). Although AA and cancer are different diseases, many of the underlying processes that contribute to the disorders of the joints and connective tissue that characterize AA also affect cancer progression and metastasis. Systemically, AA can lead to cellular infiltration and inflammation of the lungs. Several studies have reported statistically significant risk ratios between AA and breast cancer. Despite this knowledge being available, there has been minimal research linking breast cancer, arthritis, and metastasis associated with breast cancer. Notably both diseases are extremely prevalent in older post-menopausal women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#4,481,216
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,129
of 8,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,389
of 123,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#13
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.