You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of two commercial global miRNA expression profiling platforms for detection of less abundant miRNAs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-435 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steffen G Jensen, Philippe Lamy, Mads H Rasmussen, Marie S Ostenfeld, Lars Dyrskjøt, Torben F Ørntoft, Claus L Andersen |
| Abstract |
microRNAs (miRNA) are short, endogenous transcripts that negatively regulate the expression of specific mRNA targets. miRNAs are found both in tissues and body fluids such as plasma. A major perspective for the use of miRNAs in the clinical setting is as diagnostic plasma markers for neoplasia. While miRNAs are abundant in tissues, they are often scarce in plasma. For quantification of miRNA in plasma it is therefore of importance to use a platform with high sensitivity and linear performance in the low concentration range. This motivated us to evaluate the performance of three commonly used commercial miRNA quantification platforms: GeneChip miRNA 2.0 Array, miRCURY Ready-to-Use PCR, Human panel I+II V1.M, and TaqMan Human MicroRNA Array v3.0. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 188 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 68 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,905,494
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,725
of 11,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,170
of 129,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#19
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.