↓ Skip to main content

Autologous bone marrow stem cell intralesional transplantation repairing bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Face Medicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autologous bone marrow stem cell intralesional transplantation repairing bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaw
Published in
Head & Face Medicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-160x-7-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luigi Cella, Aldo Oppici, Mariacristina Arbasi, Mauro Moretto, Massimo Piepoli, Daniele Vallisa, Adriano Zangrandi, Camilla Di Nunzio, Luigi Cavanna

Abstract

Bisphosphonate - related osteonecrosis of the JAW (BRONJ) is a well known side effect of bisphosphonate therapies in oncologic and non oncologic patients. Since to date no definitive consensus has been reached on the treatment of BRONJ, novel strategies for the prevention, risk reduction and treatment need to be developed. We report a 75 year old woman with stage 3 BRONJ secondary to alendronate and pamidronate treatment of osteoporosis. The patient was unresponsive to recommended treatment of the disease, and her BRONJ was worsening. Since bone marrow stem cells are know as being multipotent and exhibit the potential for differentiation into different cells/tissue lineages, including cartilage, bone and other tissue, we performed autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation into the BRONJ lesion of the patient.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 62 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 8 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2011.
All research outputs
#2,328,162
of 4,505,992 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#52
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,676
of 61,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them