↓ Skip to main content

Ambulatory oxygen for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are not hypoxaemic at rest

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ambulatory oxygen for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are not hypoxaemic at rest
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000238.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faisal Ameer, Kristin V Carson, Zafar A Usmani, Brian J Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 182 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 12 7%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Psychology 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 45 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,469,404
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,575
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,813
of 197,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.