↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of cancer in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
46 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
521 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of cancer in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007469.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goran Bjelakovic, Lise Lotte Gluud, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Kate Whitfield, Goran Krstic, Jørn Wetterslev, Christian Gluud

Abstract

The evidence on whether vitamin D supplementation is effective in decreasing cancers is contradictory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 521 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 511 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 91 17%
Student > Bachelor 78 15%
Researcher 53 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 91 17%
Unknown 130 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 201 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 4%
Psychology 14 3%
Other 63 12%
Unknown 156 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#424,587
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#739
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,615
of 243,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.