↓ Skip to main content

Anticonvulsants for chronic low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticonvulsants for chronic low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011171
Authors

Dailson M Bezerra, Regina El Dib, Edison IO Vidal, Guilherme AM De Barros, Roger Chou, Fernanda Fukushima

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#2,216,373
of 6,337,722 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,343
of 7,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,234
of 146,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,337,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.