↓ Skip to main content

Anticonvulsants for chronic low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticonvulsants for chronic low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011171
Authors

Dailson M Bezerra, Regina El Dib, Edison IO Vidal, Guilherme AM De Barros, Roger Chou, Fernanda Fukushima

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,346,098
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,831
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,796
of 198,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.