↓ Skip to main content

Compassionate Release Policy Reform: Physicians as Advocates for Human Dignity

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
51 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Compassionate Release Policy Reform: Physicians as Advocates for Human Dignity
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, September 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.9.peer2-1709
Pubmed ID
Abstract

A rapidly aging correctional population has led to an increasing number of patients with serious progressive and terminal illnesses in correctional settings. "Compassionate release" describes a range of policies offering early release or parole to incarcerated patients with serious or debilitating illnesses. However, in many states that have compassionate release policies, few patients are actually granted release. We describe how the continued incarceration of patients with serious or debilitating illness can constitute a violation of human dignity if appropriate palliative care is unavailable. We argue that, given the importance in medical ethics of upholding dignity, physicians should advocate for the appropriate application and use of compassionate release. We describe several opportunities for physicians to take leadership on this issue.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Psychology 4 14%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%