You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Counseling Patients on Preventing Prenatal Environmental Exposures - A Mixed-Methods Study of Obstetricians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0098771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naomi E. Stotland, Patrice Sutton, Jessica Trowbridge, Dylan S. Atchley, Jeanne Conry, Leonardo Trasande, Barbara Gerbert, Annemarie Charlesworth, Tracey J. Woodruff |
| Abstract |
Describe the attitudes, beliefs, and practices of U.S. obstetricians on the topic of prenatal environmental exposures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 43% |
| Canada | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 14% |
| Psychology | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#418,864
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,883
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,540
of 243,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#120
of 4,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.