↓ Skip to main content

Wing pathology of white-nose syndrome in bats suggests life-threatening disruption of physiology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wing pathology of white-nose syndrome in bats suggests life-threatening disruption of physiology
Published in
BMC Biology, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-8-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M Cryan, Carol Uphoff Meteyer, Justin G Boyles, David S Blehert

Abstract

White-nose syndrome (WNS) is causing unprecedented declines in several species of North American bats. The characteristic lesions of WNS are caused by the fungus Geomyces destructans, which erodes and replaces the living skin of bats while they hibernate. It is unknown how this infection kills the bats. We review here the unique physiological importance of wings to hibernating bats in relation to the damage caused by G. destructans and propose that mortality is caused by catastrophic disruption of wing-dependent physiological functions. Mechanisms of disease associated with G. destructans seem specific to hibernating bats and are most analogous to disease caused by chytrid fungus in amphibians.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 4%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 343 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 24%
Student > Bachelor 82 22%
Researcher 57 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Other 24 6%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 32 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 205 55%
Environmental Science 52 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 40 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#423,137
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#97
of 1,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,189
of 100,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.