You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner’s survey response rates – a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-76 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabrina Winona Pit, Tham Vo, Sagun Pyakurel |
| Abstract |
Low survey response rates in general practice are common and lead to loss of power, selection bias, unexpected budgetary constraints and time delays in research projects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2016.
All research outputs
#13,060,986
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,218
of 2,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,548
of 228,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.