↓ Skip to main content

Angioplasty versus bare metal stenting for superficial femoral artery lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angioplasty versus bare metal stenting for superficial femoral artery lesions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006767.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed M Chowdhury, Alexander D McLain, Christopher P Twine

Abstract

Lower limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common, important manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis. Stenoses or occlusions in the superficial femoral artery may result in intermittent claudication or even critical ischaemia, which may be treated by balloon angioplasty with or without stenting. This is the first update of a review published in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 31 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,082,781
of 15,298,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,735
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,414
of 189,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,298,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.