↓ Skip to main content

Definición de alta hospitalaria, lesión grave y muerte por lesiones por tráfico

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Definición de alta hospitalaria, lesión grave y muerte por lesiones por tráfico
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.10.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Pérez, María Seguí-Gómez, Vita Arrufat, Eneko Barberia, Elena Cabeza, Eva Cirera, Mercedes Gil, Carlos Martín, Ana M. Novoa, Marta Olabarría, Pablo Lardelli, Josep Maria Suelves, Elena Santamariña-Rubio

Abstract

Road traffic injury surveillance involves methodological difficulties due, among other reasons, to the lack of consensus criteria for case definition. Police records have usually been the main source of information for monitoring traffic injuries, while health system data has hardly been used. Police records usually include comprehensive information on the characteristics of the crash, but often underreport injury cases and do not collect reliable information on the severity of injuries. However, statistics on severe traffic injuries have been based almost exclusively on police data. The aim of this paper is to propose criteria based on medical records to define: a) "Hospital discharge for traffic injuries", b) "Person with severe traffic injury", and c) "Death from traffic injuries" in order to homogenize the use of these sources.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 6%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Engineering 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,053,733
of 13,376,849 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#332
of 607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,795
of 187,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,376,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.