↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preserving residual kidney function in peritoneal dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preserving residual kidney function in peritoneal dialysis patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009120.pub2
Pubmed ID
24953826
Authors

Ling Zhang, Xiaoxi Zeng, Ping Fu, Hong Mei Wu

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, yet controversy exists about their impact on residual kidney function.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,342,284
of 15,798,956 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,979
of 11,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,135
of 190,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,798,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.