↓ Skip to main content

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preserving residual kidney function in peritoneal dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preserving residual kidney function in peritoneal dialysis patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009120.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ling Zhang, Xiaoxi Zeng, Ping Fu, Hong Mei Wu

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, yet controversy exists about their impact on residual kidney function.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 13 18%
Researcher 10 14%
Unspecified 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 22 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 58%
Unspecified 16 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,981,381
of 13,381,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,030
of 10,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,394
of 187,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,381,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.