You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Should oral gavage be abandoned in toxicity testing of endocrine disruptors?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-13-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura N Vandenberg, Wade V Welshons, Frederick S vom Saal, Pierre-Louis Toutain, John Peterson Myers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| France | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,801,661
of 24,667,989 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#369
of 1,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,852
of 233,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,667,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.