↓ Skip to main content

Brave new green world – Consequences of a carbon economy for the conservation of Australian biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brave new green world – Consequences of a carbon economy for the conservation of Australian biodiversity
Published in
Biological Conservation, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.012
Authors

Corey J.A. Bradshaw, David M.J.S. Bowman, Nick R. Bond, Brett P. Murphy, Andrew D. Moore, Damien A. Fordham, Richard Thackway, Michael J. Lawes, Hamish McCallum, Stephen D. Gregory, Ram C. Dalal, Matthias M. Boer, A. Jasmyn J. Lynch, Ross A. Bradstock, Barry W. Brook, Beverley K. Henry, Leigh P. Hunt, Diana O. Fisher, David Hunter, Christopher N. Johnson, David A. Keith, Edward C. Lefroy, Trent D. Penman, Wayne S. Meyer, James R. Thomson, Craig M. Thornton, Jeremy VanDerWal, Richard J. Williams, Lucy Keniger, Alison Specht

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 12 4%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 288 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 18%
Student > Master 29 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 62 20%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 103 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 78 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,715,395
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,434
of 6,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,559
of 205,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#10
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.