↓ Skip to main content

Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-7922-8-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salomone Di Saverio, Federico Coccolini, Marica Galati, Nazareno Smerieri, Walter L Biffl, Luca Ansaloni, Gregorio Tugnoli, George C Velmahos, Massimo Sartelli, Cino Bendinelli, Gustavo Fraga, Michael D Kelly, Frederick A Moore, Vincenzo Mandalà, Stefano Mandalà, Michele Masetti, Elio Jovine, Antonio D Pinna, Andrew B Peitzman, Ari Leppaniemi, Paul H Sugarbaker, Harry Goor, Ernest E Moore, Johannes Jeekel, Fausto Catena

Abstract

In 2013 Guidelines on diagnosis and management of ASBO have been revised and updated by the WSES Working Group on ASBO to develop current evidence-based algorithms and focus indications and safety of conservative treatment, timing of surgery and indications for laparoscopy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 234 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 52 21%
Other 38 15%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Master 26 11%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 19 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 190 77%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 26 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,037,887
of 16,046,842 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#125
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,397
of 190,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,046,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them