You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective use of a clinical decision rule to identify pulmonary embolism as likely cause of outpatient cardiac arrest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.07.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Mark Courtney, Jeffrey A. Kline |
| Abstract |
A clinical decision rule (CDR) derived retrospectively found that 57% of outpatients aged 65 years or less, with witnessed arrest+PEA had pulmonary embolism (PE) as cause of cardiac arrest. These retrospectively studied patients also had significant frequency of pre-arrest respiratory distress, altered mental status, and shock. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 16% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 29% |
| Scientists | 9 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 53% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#737,423
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#173
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#853
of 74,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.