↓ Skip to main content

Periconception in Physiology and Medicine

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Exploitation of Non-mammalian Model Organisms in Epigenetic Research
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Exploitation of Non-mammalian Model Organisms in Epigenetic Research
Chapter number 9
Book title
Periconception in Physiology and Medicine
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62414-3_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-962412-9, 978-3-31-962414-3
Authors

William V. Holt, Holt, William V.

Abstract

Model organisms are widely used in research that is ultimately aimed at understanding the causes and consequences of human disease. It may seem counterintuitive to expect clinically useful information to be obtained from species as diverse as fishes and insects, but because fundamental biological mechanisms share evolutionary origins they transcend species barriers. Epigenetic mechanisms fulfil this expectation admirably as more and more is discovered about the basic operational rules of inheritance, which are much more elaborate than formerly thought. Only a few decades ago, although the complex interplay between genes, inheritance and the environment was recognized, it was difficult to explain. Recent discoveries about the controlling influences of gene silencing through DNA and histone methylation, the roles of so-called non-coding DNA and microRNA, and the way in which these factors respond to environmental conditions have started to shed light on these basic mechanisms. Diverse model species allow epigenetic mechanisms to be studied from different perspectives; for example, some are better suited to studies of sex determination while others may be more convenient for studying the earliest stages of organ development, growth and the influence of nutrition on future wellbeing. The rationale for including this chapter in a book that is focused on uncovering relationships between periconception nutrition in humans is to highlight the opportunities and insights that may be gained by focusing attention on studies in non-mammalian model species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 5 25%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,446,373
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,985
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,140
of 421,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#414
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.