You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone–releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009266.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank Kunath, Henrik R Grobe, Gerta Rücker, Edith Motschall, Gerd Antes, Philipp Dahm, Bernd Wullich, Joerg J Meerpohl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,001,848
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,316
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,104
of 242,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.