You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of a smartphone application to promote physical activity in primary care: the SMART MOVE randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x680461 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam G Glynn, Patrick S Hayes, Monica Casey, Fergus Glynn, Alberto Alvarez-Iglesias, John Newell, Gearóid OLaighin, David Heaney, Martin O'Donnell, Andrew W Murphy |
| Abstract |
Physical inactivity is a major, potentially modifiable, risk factor for cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other chronic diseases. Effective, simple, and generalisable interventions that will increase physical activity in populations are needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 34% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Singapore | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Israel | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 63% |
| Scientists | 13 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 607 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 596 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 120 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 96 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 14% |
| Researcher | 46 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 108 | 18% |
| Unknown | 121 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 98 | 16% |
| Psychology | 50 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 46 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 103 | 17% |
| Unknown | 152 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#680,757
of 25,069,047 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#281
of 4,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,286
of 233,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,069,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.