↓ Skip to main content

Complex systems and individual-level approaches to population health: a false dichotomy?

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Public Health, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
176 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complex systems and individual-level approaches to population health: a false dichotomy?
Published in
The Lancet Public Health, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30167-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Falko F Sniehotta, Vera Araújo-Soares, Jamie Brown, Michael P Kelly, Susan Michie, Robert West

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 176 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Unspecified 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 31 31%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Psychology 20 20%
Unspecified 20 20%
Social Sciences 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#133,627
of 13,727,342 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Public Health
#73
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,920
of 267,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Public Health
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,727,342 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.