↓ Skip to main content

Complex systems and individual-level approaches to population health: a false dichotomy?

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Public Health, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
177 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complex systems and individual-level approaches to population health: a false dichotomy?
Published in
The Lancet Public Health, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30167-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Falko F Sniehotta, Vera Araújo-Soares, Jamie Brown, Michael P Kelly, Susan Michie, Robert West

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Master 19 14%
Other 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 19%
Psychology 27 19%
Social Sciences 22 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 31 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#210,428
of 17,834,976 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Public Health
#154
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,454
of 280,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Public Health
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,834,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 152.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.