↓ Skip to main content

Leadership and management in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a qualitative study of students' attitudes and opinions at one UK medical school

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leadership and management in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a qualitative study of students' attitudes and opinions at one UK medical school
Published in
BMJ Open, June 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005353
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Quince, M. Abbas, S. Murugesu, F. Crawley, S. Hyde, D. Wood, J. Benson

Abstract

To explore undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards and opinions about leadership and management education.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 18%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 50 31%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 59%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 28 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#5,021,879
of 15,922,425 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#8,038
of 14,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,795
of 190,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#134
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.