↓ Skip to main content

Inhaled nitric oxide for the postoperative management of pulmonary hypertension in infants and children with congenital heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhaled nitric oxide for the postoperative management of pulmonary hypertension in infants and children with congenital heart disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005055.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Bizzarro, Ian Gross, Fabiano T Barbosa

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is a prevalent molecule in humans that is responsible for many physiologic activities including pulmonary vasodilation. An exogenous, inhaled form (iNO) exists that mimics this action without affecting systemic blood pressure. This therapy has been implemented in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. This review examines the efficacy of iNO in the postoperative management of infants and children with congenital heart disease (CHD). The original review was published in 2005, updated in 2008 and again in 2014.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Unspecified 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 31 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,936,676
of 14,125,937 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,587
of 10,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,317
of 188,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,125,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.