↓ Skip to main content

First Clinical Consensus and National Recommendations on Tracheostomized Children of the Brazilian Academy of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (ABOPe) and Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (SBP)

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First Clinical Consensus and National Recommendations on Tracheostomized Children of the Brazilian Academy of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (ABOPe) and Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (SBP)
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa A.G. Avelino, Rebecca Maunsell, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira Valera, José Faibes Lubianca Neto, Cláudia Schweiger, Carolina Sponchiado Miura, Vitor Guo Chen, Dayse Manrique, Raquel Oliveira, Fabiano Gavazzoni, Isabela Furtado de Mendonça Picinin, Paulo Bittencourt, Paulo Camargos, Fernanda Peixoto, Marcelo Barciela Brandão, Tania Maria Sih, Wilma Terezinha Anselmo-Lima

Abstract

Tracheostomy is a procedure that can be performed in any age group, including children under 1year of age. Unfortunately health professionals in Brazil have great difficulty dealing with this condition due to the lack of standard care orientation. This clinical consensus by Academia Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia Pediátrica (ABOPe) and Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP) aims to generate national recommendations on the care concerning tracheostomized children. A group of experts experienced in pediatric tracheostomy (otorhinolaryngologists, intensive care pediatricians, endoscopists, and pneumopediatricians) were selected, taking into account the different regions of Brazil and following inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results generated from this document were based on the agreement of the majority of participants regarding the indications, type of cannula, surgical techniques, care, and general guidelines and decannulation. These guidelines can be used as directives for a wide range of health professionals across the country that deal of tracheostomized children.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 8 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#11,105,709
of 12,488,416 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#215
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,948
of 263,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,488,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.