↓ Skip to main content

Swift and Certain, Proportionate and Consistent: Key Values of Urine Drug Test Consequences for Probationers

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Swift and Certain, Proportionate and Consistent: Key Values of Urine Drug Test Consequences for Probationers
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.9.stas2-1709
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy B Cadwallader

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Social Sciences 5 22%
Psychology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,792,753
of 26,238,951 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#545
of 2,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,749
of 328,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.