↓ Skip to main content

Forestry Best Management Practices Relationships with Aquatic and Riparian Fauna: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Forests, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forestry Best Management Practices Relationships with Aquatic and Riparian Fauna: A Review
Published in
Forests, September 2017
DOI 10.3390/f8090331
Authors

Brooke Warrington, W. Aust, Scott Barrett, W. Ford, C. Dolloff, Erik Schilling, T. Wigley, M. Bolding

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 29 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 23%
Engineering 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Decision Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 25 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,594,093
of 20,558,827 outputs
Outputs from Forests
#857
of 3,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,660
of 288,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forests
#24
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,558,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.