You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Forestry Best Management Practices Relationships with Aquatic and Riparian Fauna: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forests, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3390/f8090331 |
| Authors |
Brooke M. Warrington, W. Michael Aust, Scott M. Barrett, W. Mark Ford, C. Andrew Dolloff, Erik B. Schilling, T. Bently Wigley, M. Chad Bolding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,438,886
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Forests
#981
of 3,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,196
of 315,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forests
#27
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.