You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of a workplace-based weight loss program for overweight male shift workers: The Workplace POWER (Preventing Obesity Without Eating like a Rabbit) randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Preventive Medicine, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip J. Morgan, Clare E. Collins, Ronald C. Plotnikoff, Alyce T. Cook, Bronwyn Berthon, Simon Mitchell, Robin Callister |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a workplace-based weight loss program (Workplace POWER-WP) for male shift workers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 20% |
| Comoros | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 358 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 76 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 13% |
| Researcher | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 64 | 17% |
| Unknown | 71 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 12% |
| Psychology | 35 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 15% |
| Unknown | 90 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,686,140
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#1,144
of 5,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,443
of 124,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.