↓ Skip to main content

The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
173 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-694
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy W Batterham, Rachelle Buchbinder, Alison Beauchamp, Sarity Dodson, Gerald R Elsworth, Richard H Osborne

Abstract

Health literacy is a multi-dimensional concept comprising a range of cognitive, affective, social, and personal skills and attributes. This paper describes the research and development protocol for a large communities-based collaborative project in Victoria, Australia that aims to identify and respond to health literacy issues for people with chronic conditions. The project, called Ophelia (OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy) Victoria, is a partnership between two universities, eight service organisations and the Victorian Government. Based on the identified issues, it will develop and pilot health literacy interventions across eight disparate health services to inform the creation of a health literacy response framework to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
North Macedonia 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 204 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 59 27%
Unknown 12 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 20%
Social Sciences 30 14%
Psychology 13 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 23 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#163,833
of 15,386,317 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#141
of 10,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,105
of 189,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,386,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them