↓ Skip to main content

Low seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in Boer goats in Missouri

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in Boer goats in Missouri
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Molly D Baker, Patrick O Pithua

Abstract

Goats are known reservoirs of Coxiella burnetii, the etiologic agent of Q fever. However, there has been very little research on the prevalence of C. burnetii exposure and risk in meat goats farmed in the US. Banked serum samples were secondarily tested for C. burnetii specific antibodies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 57%
Unspecified 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,538,795
of 11,411,580 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,069
of 2,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,378
of 185,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#44
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,411,580 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,482 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.