↓ Skip to main content

Guild-specific responses of avian species richness to LiDAR-derived habitat heterogeneity

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Oecologica, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guild-specific responses of avian species richness to LiDAR-derived habitat heterogeneity
Published in
Acta Oecologica, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2014.06.002
Authors

Peter J. Weisberg, Thomas E. Dilts, Miles E. Becker, Jock S. Young, Diane C. Wong-Kone, Wesley E. Newton, Elisabeth M. Ammon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Mexico 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 67 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Student > Master 17 23%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 55%
Environmental Science 22 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 6 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,516,003
of 12,018,607 outputs
Outputs from Acta Oecologica
#159
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,125
of 192,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Oecologica
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,018,607 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.