↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Мaxim L Golovakhа, Weniamin Orljanski, Karl-Peter Benedetto, Sergey Panchenko, Philippe Büchler, Philipp Henle, Emin Aghayev

Abstract

Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a well-established procedure for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis and symptomatic varus malalignment. We hypothesized that different fixation devices generate different fixation stability profiles for the various wedge sizes in a finite element (FE) analysis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 6 20%
Unspecified 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 10 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Engineering 9 30%
Psychology 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,627,668
of 8,702,492 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,721
of 2,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,671
of 179,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#80
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,702,492 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.